A National Socialist Government will provide free health care to White citizens. It's no secret that
health care costs for White people is spiraling out of control in this country. On average, White people now spend more per
person on health care than both food and housing. Insurance premiums are multiplying much faster than inflation, which prevents
economic growth and leaves businesses with less money to give raises or hire more workers. While the quality and availability
of medical care in the United States remains among the best in the world, many wonder whether we'd be better off adopting
a universal government-controlled health care system like the one used in Canada.
White taxpayers money needs
to stay in White taxpayers pockets.
The number of uninsured White citizens has grown to over 30 million.
Since health care premiums continue to grow at several times the rate of inflation, many businesses are simply choosing to
not offer a health plan, or if they do, to pass on more of the cost to employees. Employees facing higher costs themselves
are often choosing to go without health coverage. No health insurance doesn't necessarily mean no health care since there
are many clinics and services that are free to indigent individuals. However, any costs not covered by insurance must be absorbed
by all the rest of us, which means even higher premiums.
Since health care premiums continue to grow
at several times the rate of inflation, many businesses are simply choosing to not offer a health plan, or if they do, to
pass on more of the cost to employees. Employees facing higher costs themselves are often choosing to go without health coverage.
No health insurance doesn't necessarily mean no health care since there are many clinics and services that are free to
indigent individuals. However, any costs not covered by insurance must be absorbed by all the rest of us, which means even
higher premiums.
Health care has become increasingly unaffordable for businesses and individuals. Businesses
and individuals that choose to keep their health plans still must pay a much higher amount. Remember, Businesses only have
a certain amount of money they can spend on labor. If they must spend more on health insurance premiums, they will have less
money to spend on raises, new hires, investment, and so on. Individuals who must pay more for premiums have less money to
spend on rent, food, and consumer goods; in other words, less money is pumped back into the economy. Thus, health care prevents
the country from making a robust economic recovery. A simpler government-controlled system that reduces costs would go a long
way in helping that recovery.
Businesses and individuals that choose to keep their
health plans still must pay a much higher amount. Remember, Businesses only have a certain amount of money they can spend
on labor. If they must spend more on health insurance premiums, they will have less money to spend on raises, new hires, investment,
and so on. Individuals who must pay more for premiums have less money to spend on rent, food, and consumer goods; in other
words, less money is pumped back into the economy. Thus, health care prevents the country from making a robust economic recovery.
A simpler government-controlled system that reduces costs would go a long way in helping that recovery.
We
can eliminate wasteful inefficiencies such as duplicate paper work, claim approval, insurance submission, etc. Think back
to all the times in your life you've had to fill out a medical history, answering the same questions over and over. Think
about all the insurance paperwork you've had to fill out and submit. Our current health care system generates an enormous
amount of overhead. Every time we go to the doctor, a claim must be submitted, an approval department has to go over the claim,
checks have to be mailed, patients are sent co-pay bills, and so on. The thing that's especially wasteful is that each
doctor's office usually maintains their own record-keeping system. A universal healthcare plan would allow us to build
one centralized system. There would be no need for maintaining insurance information or wasting time submitting claims. The
work savings in the banking and postal areas alone would be worth billions every year.
Think back
to all the times in your life you've had to fill out a medical history, answering the same questions over and over. Think
about all the insurance paperwork you've had to fill out and submit. Our current health care system generates an enormous
amount of overhead. Every time we go to the doctor, a claim must be submitted, an approval department has to go over the claim,
checks have to be mailed, patients are sent co-pay bills, and so on. The thing that's especially wasteful is that each
doctor's office usually maintains their own record-keeping system. A universal healthcare plan would allow us to build
one centralized system. There would be no need for maintaining insurance information or wasting time submitting claims. The
work savings in the banking and postal areas alone would be worth billions every year.
We can develop
a centralized national database which makes diagnosis and treatment easier for doctors. Most doctor's offices maintain
a separate record-keeping system. This is why you always have to fill out a lengthy health history whenever you go to a new
physician. This is a problem for several reasons. First of all, it's wasteful of both time and money. Second of all, patients
may lie, forget, or do a poor job of explaining past medical problems. Doctors need accurate information to make a proper
diagnosis. Last of all, separate systems means we have a tougher time analyzing data at a national level. For example, are
incidents of a certain disease dropping? How often is a certain illness associated with a specific set of symptoms? A centralized
national system would allow us to do data analysis that we never dreamed possible, leading to medical advances and increased
diagnosis efficiency. The main argument against a centralized database is that certain insurance providers may deny coverage
if they find certain past medical problems. However, if the government is paying for everything, that should never be a problem.
Most doctor's offices maintain a separate record-keeping system. This is why you always have to fill
out a lengthy health history whenever you go to a new physician. This is a problem for several reasons. First of all, it's
wasteful of both time and money. Second of all, patients may lie, forget, or do a poor job of explaining past medical problems.
Doctors need accurate information to make a proper diagnosis. Last of all, separate systems means we have a tougher time analyzing
data at a national level. For example, are incidents of a certain disease dropping? How often is a certain illness associated
with a specific set of symptoms? A centralized national system would allow us to do data analysis that we never dreamed possible,
leading to medical advances and increased diagnosis efficiency. The main argument against a centralized database is that certain
insurance providers may deny coverage if they find certain past medical problems. However, if the government is paying for
everything, that should never be a problem.
Medical professionals can concentrate on healing the patient
rather than on insurance procedures, malpractice liability, etc. Doctors have to take classes now simply to understand all
the insurance plans out there; they are often restricted by insurance practices, such as what tests can be ordered. Doctors
must practice defensive medicine to avoid getting sued. Some physicians are even leaving the profession rather than deal with
all these non-medical headaches. A simplified universal health system would allow doctors, nurses, and other medical professions
to simply focus on doing what's best for the patient. Medicine is a complex enough subject as it is. Our current system
just adds to an already mentally-draining profession.
Doctors have to take classes now simply to understand
all the insurance plans out there; they are often restricted by insurance practices, such as what tests can be ordered. Doctors
must practice defensive medicine to avoid getting sued. Some physicians are even leaving the profession rather than deal with
all these non-medical headaches. A simplified universal health system would allow doctors, nurses, and other medical professions
to simply focus on doing what's best for the patient. Medicine is a complex enough subject as it is. Our current system
just adds to an already mentally-draining profession.
Free medical services would encourage patients
to practice preventive medicine and inquire about problems early when treatment will be light; currently, patients often avoid
physicals and other preventive measures because of the costs. Because many people are uninsured and those that do have insurance
face high deductibles, Americans often forego doctor visits for minor health problems or for preventive medicine. Thus, health
problems that could be caught at an early stage or prevented altogether become major illnesses. Things like routine physicals,
mammograms, and HIV tests could prevent major problems. This not only affects the health of the patient but the overall cost
of the system, since preventive medicine costs only a small fraction of a full blown disease. A government-provided system
would remove the disincentive patients have for visiting a medical professional.
Because many people are
uninsured and those that do have insurance face high deductibles, Americans often forego doctor visits for minor health problems
or for preventive medicine. Thus, health problems that could be caught at an early stage or prevented altogether become major
illnesses. Things like routine physicals, mammograms, and HIV tests could prevent major problems. This not only affects the
health of the patient but the overall cost of the system, since preventive medicine costs only a small fraction of a full
blown disease. A government-provided system would remove the disincentive patients have for visiting a medical professional.
The removal of non-Whites and illegal immigrants from America will reduce costs. The increasing
number of illegal aliens coming into the United States is forcing the closure of hospitals, spreading previously vanquished
diseases and threatening to destroy America's prized health-care system, says a report in the spring 2008 issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.
"Anchor babies," the author writes, "born to illegal aliens instantly qualify
as citizens for welfare benefits and have caused enormous rises in Medicaid costs and stipends under Supplemental Security
Income and Disability Income."
Other health threats from illegals include, according to the report:
Chagas
disease, also called American trypanosomiasis or "kissing bug disease," is transmitted by the reduviid bug, which
prefers to bite the lips and face. The protozoan parasite that it carries, Trypanosoma cruzi, infects 18 million people annually
in Latin America and causes 50,000 deaths. The disease also infiltrates America's blood supply. Chagas affects blood transfusions
and transplanted organs. No cure exists. Hundreds of blood recipients may be silently infected.
Leprosy, also known
as Hansen's disease, was so rare in America that in 40 years only 900 people were afflicted. Suddenly, in the past three
years America has more than 7,000 cases of leprosy. Leprosy now is endemic to northeastern states because illegal aliens and
other immigrants brought leprosy from India, Brazil, the Caribbean and Mexico.
Dengue fever is exceptionally rare in
America, though common in Ecuador, Peru, Vietnam, Thailand, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Mexico. Recently, according to the report,
there was a virulent outbreak of dengue fever in Webb County, Texas, which borders Mexico. Though dengue is usually not a
fatal disease, dengue hemorrhagic fever routinely kills.
Polio was eradicated from America, but now reappears in illegal
immigrants as do intestinal parasites, says the report. Malaria was obliterated, but now is re-emerging in Texas.